moving thunar to gtk3
acs82 at gmx.de
Sat Apr 15 08:32:54 CEST 2017
That's Great, thanks! I will have a look on the broken icons, etc.
Am 15. April 2017 03:53:33 MESZ schrieb "André Miranda" <andre42m at gmail.com>:
>As we have discussed at #xfce-dev, I created a github fork
>(github.com/andreldm/thunar), applied the changes from
>rgcjonas/thunar-gtk3 on top of the current master and made two small
>fixes to make it compile again. Taking a quick look, things are mostly
>working, I could only spot broken icons when using Compact List and
>Icons views. I think that the job now is to assess the regressions (and
>fix them) and handle the deprecations warnings (not the most urgent
>task, but very welcome).
>So I propose to anyone that wishes to collaborate to fork my fork and
>make pull requests (or ask me push rights if you will) then eventually
>we should be able to get thunar in shape to merge with master @
>On 14-04-2017 17:23, Simon Steinbeiss wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>> that's great!
>> Please note that Thunar isn't very stable as it is in Gtk2, mostly
>> threading stuff as far as I can tell.
>> There are various efforts which have been undertaken by different
>> people, there is a fairly old but probably ok approach from Nick on
>> git.xfce.org <http://git.xfce.org> and there are also two
>> (unfinished?) ports on github. So the first job would be evaluating
>> those efforts and merging them meaningfully.
>> Furthermore you'll face several design decisions, e.g. regarding
>> custom widgetry or exo.
>> Providing your work on github is a good start.
>> You should definitely join the irc channel though, helps with getting
>> answers and hopefully guidance at times. Please be patient though,
>> people aren't always around.
>> Alex <acs82 at gmx.de <mailto:acs82 at gmx.de>> schrieb am Do., 13. Apr.
>> 2017, 23:52:
>> Hi all,
>> I would like to start work on moving thunar to gtk3. However I
>> have some very basic questions:
>> I dont have an account for git.xfce.org <http://git.xfce.org>
>> Should I get an account first to be able to generate a branch
>> Or is it as well fine for you if I fork & provide the result on
>> e.g. github ?
>> Regarding the right codebase:
>> Should I branch the master of git://git.xfce.org/xfce/thunar ?
>> Or should I use some of the (real old) work in process repos as
>> base, which are suggested here:
>> https://wiki.xfce.org/releng/4.14/roadmap/thunar ?
>> [Thunar] Gtk3 porting - preparation step
>> Chren //
>> --> looks like these patches are not merged into master yet ?
>> Thanks & Cheers,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Xfce4-dev