xfce/modules/trunk(-po): all core modules?!
Stephan Arts
stephan at xfce.org
Wed Nov 28 09:08:02 CET 2007
On Nov 28, 2007 9:04 AM, Stephan Arts <stephan at xfce.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, what is the policy regarding the
> xfce/modules/trunk(-po) link in svn?
>
> Does it cover all 'core' components, or should it cover all trunk's
> from every component inside the xfce repositories?
>
> At the moment, it contains the following modules:
>
> - libexo
> - libxfce4menu
> - libxfce4util
> - libxfcegui4
> - mousepad
> - thunar
> - xfcalendar (s/xfcalendar/orage/ ?)
> - xfce4-appfinder
> - xfce4-icon-theme (rodent should really be made somewhat
> icon-naming-spec compliant i guess, but's that offtopic)
> - xfce4-mixer
> - xfce4-panel
> - xfce4-session
> - xfce4-terminal
> - xfce4-toys (dummy package)
> - xfce4-trigger-launcher
> - xfce-mcs-manager
> - xfce-mcs-plugins
> - xfce-utils
> - xfdesktop
> - xffm (no longer part of xfce releases)
> - xfmedia
> - xfprint
> - xfwm4
>
> And, the following modules reside in the repositories besides that:
>
> - installit
> - libfrap
> - pyxfce
> - terminal
> - squeeze
> - xarchiver
> - xfburn
> - xfc
> - xfce-installers
> - xfce4-debs
> - xfce4-iconbox
> - xfce4-perl
> - xfce4-systray
> - xfce4-themes
> - xffm-icons
> - xfwm4-themes
>
> I imagine some of these components are outdated, depricated or
> abandoned. Others are brand-new or experimental. But in any case, I
> believe the xfce/modules/trunk(-po) links are a bit outdated, it might
> be a good idea what to include and what to exclude from it.
s/good idea/good idea to discuss/
oops :p
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
>
> Note:
> Mike's xdt-i18n script[0] checks-out this link, so any package not
> inside the xfce/modules/trunk-po thingy is not going to be checked out
> for translation.
>
-
Stephan
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list