xfce/modules/trunk(-po): all core modules?!

Stephan Arts stephan at xfce.org
Wed Nov 28 09:08:02 CET 2007


On Nov 28, 2007 9:04 AM, Stephan Arts <stephan at xfce.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, what is the policy regarding the
> xfce/modules/trunk(-po) link in svn?
>
> Does it cover all 'core' components, or should it cover all trunk's
> from every component inside the xfce repositories?
>
> At the moment, it contains the following modules:
>
>  - libexo
>  - libxfce4menu
>  - libxfce4util
>  - libxfcegui4
>  - mousepad
>  - thunar
>  - xfcalendar (s/xfcalendar/orage/ ?)
>  - xfce4-appfinder
>  - xfce4-icon-theme (rodent should really be made somewhat
> icon-naming-spec compliant i guess, but's that offtopic)
>  - xfce4-mixer
>  - xfce4-panel
>  - xfce4-session
>  - xfce4-terminal
>  - xfce4-toys (dummy package)
>  - xfce4-trigger-launcher
>  - xfce-mcs-manager
>  - xfce-mcs-plugins
>  - xfce-utils
>  - xfdesktop
>  - xffm (no longer part of xfce releases)
>  - xfmedia
>  - xfprint
>  - xfwm4
>
> And, the following modules reside in the repositories besides that:
>
>  - installit
>  - libfrap
>  - pyxfce
>  - terminal
>  - squeeze
>  - xarchiver
>  - xfburn
>  - xfc
>  - xfce-installers
>  - xfce4-debs
>  - xfce4-iconbox
>  - xfce4-perl
>  - xfce4-systray
>  - xfce4-themes
>  - xffm-icons
>  - xfwm4-themes
>
> I imagine some of these components are outdated, depricated or
> abandoned. Others are brand-new or experimental. But in any case, I
> believe the xfce/modules/trunk(-po) links are a bit outdated, it might
> be a good idea what to include and what to exclude from it.

s/good idea/good idea to discuss/

oops :p

>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
>
> Note:
> Mike's xdt-i18n script[0] checks-out this link, so any package not
> inside the xfce/modules/trunk-po thingy is not going to be checked out
> for translation.
>

-
Stephan



More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list