GTK+ 3

Maximilien Noal noal.maximilien at
Mon Oct 17 08:54:02 CEST 2011

On 10/17/2011 06:55 AM, dE . wrote:
> On 10/16/11 16:06, Natanael Copa wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:58:54 +0530
>> "dE ."<de.techno at>  wrote:
>>> Even if tabs are implemented, what harm will it pose on users not in
>>> favor of using tabs? Those who'll use will use it, those who won't,
>>> won't use it.
>> More (unused) code = bloat = needs more memory = things gets slower.
>> If it could be implemented as a plugin it wouldn't make any
>> "harm" (except consuming developer and support time)
>> -nc
> The main bottleneck is Developer support then, to maintain a large 
> codebase; as I've stated before, it's time for xfce to become 
> mainstream, more 'heavy' cause we already have a lighter DE -- LXDE 
> which all distros are adopting instead of XFCE for a light weight 
> distro (Lubuntu is 12th while Xubuntu is 26th on distrowatch), so the 
> objectives of Xfce needs to change.
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at
In my experience, LXDE is a little heavier than Xfce, and Xfce *is* 
lightweight (which Xubuntu isn't, however)

More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list