[Goodies-dev] Xfce 4.10 Release Cycle Information [update]
Martin Wilke
miwi at FreeBSD.org
Sun Feb 27 18:33:26 CET 2011
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Landry Breuil <landry.breuil at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Nick Schermer <nickschermer at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Martin Wilke <miwi at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> still no improvements for *BSD's ??
> >
> > Nope, but no downgrade either.
> >
> > What about if BSD improved a bit?
>
> I have to agree with nick here, even if i'm the OpenBSD maintainer.
>
> Instead of complaining, we should join forces and bring the discussion to
> udev developers so that they help _us_ making it portable, as now more
> and more things rely on it. Afaik, udev is the only missing piece, as on
> FreeBSD you already have upower.
>
Well it is to easy to say, BSD's have to improve to get more support,
Why not a backport to a optional HAL function like what currently Xorg
also do? To say *BSD's have lacking of drivers etc, can only come from
pplz where never spend a bit time to any of the BSD's. What is about
Solaris?
To be honest Xfce is not that anymore what it was, it runs more and
more in the Mainstream and forgot the good old slogon.. oh well who cares
right :P?
>
> Landry
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20110228/c4c074f9/attachment.html>
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list