slower startup with 4.6?
Auke Kok
auke at foo-projects.org
Tue Mar 17 20:29:31 CET 2009
Auke Kok wrote:
> Miek Gieben wrote:
>> [ Quoting Auke Kok in "Re: slower startup with 4.6?"... ]
>>>> One other, but related question, would it be possible to
>>>> make xfce 4.6 start up in 1 or 2 seconds?
>>> care to post the bootcharts somewhere? I'd like to see them :)
>>
>> yes, of course. I've put the file at:
>> http://miek.nl/files/intrepid-20090315-2.png
>>
>> It's a complete run with auto-login from gdm which
>> starts xfce where I open a terminal to kill bootchart.
>
> without the bootchart from 4.4.x, you can't say anything. can you please
> post the bootchart from before your upgrade to 4.6 as well?
On second thought, don't bother. Your startup time is such a gigantic
failure that it's unlikely to even get any significance out of any
comparison.
First of all, sreadahead seems to be completely botched by ubuntu (I
maintain sreadahead) and runs twice? But it doesn't actually do
anything, which is likely to the fact that you run a 2.6.27 kernel,
which misses a tonload of async patches to start with. Then your box
spends the first 21 seconds after kernel boot doing modprobe and
hal/udev stuff, which is insane. Then another 10 seconds doing portmap,
nfs, smtpd(?!). When does the hurting stop??? By the time your desktop
start (gnome support enabled?!), A normal netbook user would have
already sent in his box for returns to the vendor, and gotten a refund
in the same time :)
There's just not enough *right* about this installation to make any
sense whether xfce 4.6 starts slower than 4.4.
is this a default ubunto 8.10 install? cuz that's just sad...
Auke
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list