MCS design proposal
talex5 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 7 18:51:28 CEST 2007
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:47:49 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> Whether to get involved in GConf or not has not really been discussed
> there though. I know that Benny is all for it while I am not. Others
> have not raised their voice on this topic yet AFAIK.
I recently proposed deprecating OroboROX in favour of xfwm4 on the
rox-users list, and one objection was the use of MCS.
Some people like gconf, some like flat files (no daemon), some like MCS...
but everyone wants the same system across all their programs.
It would be good if we could write and compile programs without caring
which backend our users want to use. Elektra and Uniconf were two
projects that attempted to do that, and there are more listed at
Xfce is in a good position to make such a system, because whatever Xfce
does will be picked up by the distributions and made widely available even
if no external projects show any interest at first.
Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
More information about the Xfce4-dev