Database access

mmassonnet at mmassonnet at
Thu Apr 19 14:14:05 CEST 2007

On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:34:47PM +0200, samuel wrote:
> The discussion is not even worth reading.... so why would we mind. If
> Bo wants to do something with XFC, imho he's free to do so (it's GPL
> afterall ;) )...

If the GPL isn't clear enough about the freedom for a person to write
code, just go and read the WTFPL.  You will find it on Google without

> This whole discussion is just again and again jani trying to push Xfce
> in adopting GNOME programs. I am so very very very confident that it
> is *very* save to just ignore jani's part of the discussion...
> The only thing that is important is that somebody wants to pick up XFC
> and continue working on it. That's all that matters in this mail
> thread. And i think we should try to keep the discussion limited to
> that.
> gr,S.

 Mike (m8t) Massonnet     __oo 
 GnuPG 0--" 0xF8C80F97                      ---(_)_"> 
 C4DA 431D 52F9 F930 3E5B  3E3D 546C 89D9 F8C8 0F97 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list