Xarchiver: behaviour of switch -n for Thunar integration

jp.guillemin at free.fr jp.guillemin at free.fr
Wed Jun 28 21:37:09 CEST 2006


Selon Jannis Pohlmann <info at sten-net.de>:

> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:17:03 +0200, jp.guillemin at free.fr wrote:
>
> > Selon Jannis Pohlmann <info at sten-net.de>:
> >
> > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:10:58 +0200, jp wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> > >
> > > The conclusion of my last message is that - if I'm right - the "-n"
> > > switch is not used by thunar-archive-plugin. Hence, we don't need it
> > > for Thunar integration, which is what this topic is all about.
> >
> > Wrong, this topic is about a feature request that I sent to Colossus
> > to add a "-n" switch that I plan to use within Thunar's "CUSTOM
> > ACTIONS". "CUSTOM ACTIONS" is a sufficient mechanism to make Thunar
> > call Xarchiver, waiting for the Thunar-archive-plugin to be
> > "Xarchiver ready".
>
> Yeah, I see your point. But this custom action switch is somewhat
> confused with the switches needed for thunar-archive-plugin. So my
> intention was to make clear that "-n" may be nice for people using
> custom actions or calling Xarchiver from shell, but that it is *not
> needed* for thunar-archive-plugin. That's it.
>
> BTW, if you look at the topic, which says "Xarchiver: behaviour of
> switch -n for Thunar integration" you have to admit that my posts
> indeed focus on the topic, as Thunar integration should be done by
> implementing flags needed for thunar-archive-plugin.
>
> - Jannis

Yes :)

Indeed

Cheers

JP

>





More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list