Xfce Foundation Classes 4.3.0-Test1
benedikt.meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de
Tue Jan 18 15:06:12 CET 2005
Jeff Franks wrote:
> Benedikt Meurer wrote:
>> Best would be to import this as a new package "libxfc" or "libxfc4"
>> (do we want the "4" in there?).
> There are two separate libraries, currently called libxfccore-4.3 and
> libxfcui-4.3, but these can be called libxfccore4.3 and libxfcui4.3.
> The libraries will need the minor version number to allow for parallel
> installs,should the need arise. The actual modules I've called xfccore
> and xfcui but these could be called libxfccore4 and libxfcui4, as can
> their include directories. These don't need the minor version numbers
> because programs will always be compiled against the latest release
> headers. So how about these,
> * Module names: libxfccore4 and libxfcui4.
> * Include directories: $PREFIX/include/xfce4/libxfccore4 and
> * Only need one data directory: $PREFIX/share/xfce4/libxfcui4
> * Doc directories: $PREFIX/share/doc/libxfccore4 and
> * XFC demo: $PREFIX/bin/xfcdemo4 (instead of xfc-demo)
IMHO, people don't really need the separation between the "core" and the
"ui" part. So a single CVS module would be the easiest way to maintain
it. The separation between "ui" and "core" can then be done at the
package management level.
What do you think?
More information about the Xfce4-dev