Icon problem

[Jasper Huijsmans]

Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 21:06:17 +0100
> Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> 
> 
>>If the install process base install files when missing, how can this
>>work with an RPM based system?
>>
>>I mean the first build, the files are missing, so the install process
>>add the files. All right.
>>
>>The second build, the files are present on the system (since they were
>>added by the first build/install) so the install process doesn't
> 
> include
> 
>>it.
>>
>>You see what I mean? That's might simply why I have the icons on my
> 
> RH9
> 
>>system while someone else who install the RPM I produced on that
> 
> system
> 
>>doesn't get the icons...
> 
> 
> The easiest solution for an rpm build is to:
> 
> BuildRequires:  hicolor-icon-theme
> Requires:       hicolor-icon-theme 
> 
> This is the default fallback theme used by implementations of the icon
> theme specification.
> As such it provides /usr/share/icons/hicolor/index.theme and would be
> present on both the build system and any system to which the 'new'
> libxfcegui4 rpms are being installed.
> 
> http://freedesktop.org/Software/icon-theme
> 

Yeah, that was the idea, except that Suse seems to install hicolor to 
/opt/gtk/...

Ah, well, I'll wait what brian will come up with ;-)