gettext version [Was: Re: japanese translation fail]

Ric fhj52ads at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 23 18:44:22 CEST 2003


Hi:

--- Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org> wrote:
> Benny,
> 
> I agree. That's the one I used before and it worked just
> fine (but as I
> was alone, I did not upgrade again once installed RH 9)
> 
> Cheers,
> Olivier.
> 
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 21:31, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > On Sun, 22, Jun 2003, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > 
> > > Benny,
> > 
> > Olivier,
> > 
> > > Well, I do... Everytime I do a checkout, I get tons
> of .gmo updates.
> > > And when I do a "make dist" some packages rebuild the
> gmo files, so
> > > again, I'm desynchronized with CVS.
> > > As you were bored with Makefile.am updates yourself,
> I'm sure you get my
> > > point ;)
> > 
> > Ok, you won :-). So heres my suggestion:
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gettext/gettext-0.11.5.tar.gz
> > 
> > I don't know of other gettext versions, but I know this
> one works. Until
> > someone knows a good reason to use another gettext
> version, we could standardize on this one. Opinions?

Is there a chance that y'all could stick with 0.11.4? - at
least until it proves to be unacceptable.
The 0.11.4 is the version supplied with RH9(
gettext-0.11.4-7.i386.rpm  ).  It seems a shame to mandate
an upgrade for people that just upgraded (which may keep
people from using XFce4).


> > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Olivier.
> > 
> > Benedikt



=====
Have A Great Day!

Ric
***

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com



More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list