Nepomuk and Akonadi

[abhinav]

On 11/14/2012 10:50 AM, Neil Winchurst wrote:
> On 14/11/12 18:20, abhixecutor at gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>>      Thanks for the very quick replies. The answer is as I hoped. I am fed up
>>      with KDE, Gnome, Cinnamon etc which are getting too bloated for me. Also
>>      it will mean that all the computers at home are running the same
>>      desk top.
>>
>>      Now I have to finally decide between Mint Maya Xfce and Xubuntu. At the
>>      moment Mint is winning.
>>
>>      Regards
>>
>>      Neil
>> if you really want a completely bloat free xfce then Archlinux +xfce is
>> the way to go ...
>> user has absolute control....
> Have not seen that one. I did not realise that Arch had an Xfce version,
> but I have been told that Arch is rather difficult to set up. (To answer
> a possible question, I have used Linux for about 12 years now so I am
> reasonably practised at it. And I am quite happy to use the terminal
> screen.)
>
> My current distro on my desktop is out of date so I need to update soon.
> I have checked several distros via VBox and have settled on Mint Xfce at
> the moment. My computer is fairly new and powerful so I do not need to
> worry about bloat from a speed point of view, it is just that so much of
> all those extra program I don't use anyway.
>
> I will check out Arch on distrowatch and see what gives.
>
> Thanks
>
> Neil
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> http://www.xfce.org
12 years with linux then you definitely have to try archlinux.  I jumped 
into arch after just 3 years of dabbling with Fedora,Ubuntu, and mint. 
If you read the beginners arch wiki page properly setting archlinux will 
be as fast as installing xubuntu or anyother distro(barring the download 
time).
Archlinux by default doesn't come with any DE or WM. You have to install 
and set everything up as per your needs. That's what i liked about 
archlinux.