How fast is Xfce's composite manager?
Auke Kok
sofar at lunar-linux.org
Wed Mar 16 18:54:31 CET 2005
Auke Kok wrote:
> Robert Kurowski wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:27:58 +0100
>> Alexander Toresson <alexander.toresson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm on a p2 300 with 64 mb ram, which hasn't got any 3d card.
>>> Is it worth installing xfce4 with the graphical installer to test
>>> it out, or will it just be too slow? Xcompmgr ran at less than
>>> 1 fps.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Duron 800, 256 ram, riva tnt2 (nvidia drivers), slooooooow :(
>>
>>
>
> ????
>
> p3-933, same ram, nvidia geforce2 (nvidia drivers), and it's F*CKING
> FAST even with composite on and fullscreen transparent applications!!!
>
> even on non-hw accelerated cards anything above 500MHz should be
> sweet, if not impressive. I'd bet that 300MHz is not super-swift but
> it should definately be "comfy".
I misread that post:
* on about anything other than a decent NVidia card composite in
software is slow, if not horrible. I tried on a dual xeon (2x2.6GHz)
with an ati-9500 and it sucked so bad that the only place I run it is on
said geforce2 (I don't have any other NVidia based cards).
sofar
More information about the Xfce
mailing list