Problem with FC1-Xfce4-RPM-Packages

exs exs at
Thu May 27 20:59:40 CEST 2004

Am Do, den 27.05.2004 schrieb Paul M. Bucalo um 18:51:
> On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 10:59, Chuck Mead wrote:
> > > I just followed your recommendation, but it may be worth noting that the
> > > files provided are scattered among the last three CD's, not just on the
> > > 4th one. And as hard as I have looked, I can't find on any of the CD's
> > > the 'xfce4-*' modules. Assuming that I didn't want to compile my own
> > > from source, what other builds are safe to use on FC2? RH9 or FC1?
> > 
> > I do not understand why you would not want to simply use yum to install
> > xfce4 out of the base? Yum will pick up all the deps and install them to.
> Well, only answer can be because Fedora's primary servers
> for Base, Updates and Stable are missing all of the 'xfce4-*' extra
> modules, and I never use the unstable yum repos to update or install
> from. Should I be pulling from a mirror instead of the CD's provided or
> Fedora's own primary servers? Maybe you can recommend one that has these
> missing modules packaged for FC 2?
i not unterstand. which modules? if you mean for xfce4 i can say, that
xfce4-rpm-packages for xfce4 have still existed. if you use fedora core
2 and you too lazy to compile something your only way is to install from
rpm, but the disadvantage is, as i was saying, that you have "simple"
button-themes and that doesnt look nice.
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at

More information about the Xfce mailing list