xfce4 on Suse 81

[Net Llama!]

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > XFCE4 is beta, maybe even alpha quality software.  If you expect that
> > to run on major distros, or any distro without some basic linux
> > experience, then you are int he wrong place.
>
>
> Same old song again and again....
>
> Missing the devel packages to compile the source has *NOTHING* to do with the
> quality of xfce4 that I personally do *NOT* consider as alpha.

I wasn't implying that missing devel packages had any connection to the
quality of xfce4.  And i don't consider it to be alpha either, however i
don't think there's a strict definition of alpha & beta quality out there,
so this is really open for interpretation (moreso of the folks running it
than the folks who design it, IMO).

>
> I've seen x.0 software that ran a lot worse than current xfce4

As have I.  Don't get me wrong, i'm quite pleased & impressed with XFCE4
so far.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman				netllama at linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo		     http://netllama.ipfox.com