transparent menus?

[The Matt]

On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:25, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> 
> BTW: XFce4 looks *very* good. I tried out XFce3 one year ago and I just
> didn't like it. Then I read an announcement of XFce4 beta at pro-linux,
> I saw the screenshot and I thought "I must have that on my desktop". I
> installed it, I liked I'm still impressed how clean and strait-forward
> but good-looking a desktop environment could be.

This echoes my opinion as well.  I always wanted a DE that looked good
but was fast.  But, before XFce4 you either chose a good looking hog
like GNOME or a fast desktop that made my eyes bleed.  Since I needed
anti-aliasing, I kept using GNOME.

Then XFce4 came out and all was right with the world.  The appearance of
Morphix and PHLAK having XFce4 built-in, and Gentoo's announcement of
XFce4 joining GNOME and KDE as a default, has made my life all the more
better.

Matt
-- 
I am a theoretical chemist.  Fear me!
 Matt Thompson -- http://ucsub.colorado.edu/~thompsma/
 440 UCB, Boulder, CO  80309-0440
 JILA A510, 303-492-4662
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20031216/acb9ea0c/attachment.pgp>