[Xfce-i18n] pt_BR translations update
Daichi Kawahata
daichi at xfce.org
Tue Nov 22 14:36:25 CET 2005
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:35:19 -0500
Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
> >
> > as you see, the copyright holder for PO files would be the one
> > who has copyright of entire package, in other words, core
> > developer(s) of that package, the reason I've been considering
> > it's good for the package maintenance is that if copyright holding
> > will be allowed individually, next case can be happened; While
> > first translator refers his/her copyright and licenses under GPL,
> > second translator tries to re-license with LGPL/BSD (because a
> > translator though GPL was too strict), at the same time, Debian
> > package maintainer struggles with those licenses.
>
> Second and posterior translators can't relicense the work since they
> are not the copyright holders. Only a copyright holder can relicense
> a work. I didn't understand the Debian maintainer issue, I don't
> recall we[0] had such a situation.
Good to hear, then my concerns could be replaced, `What if you'll happen
to see the case below?'
http://foo-projects.org/pipermail/xfce4-commits/2005-September/018283.html
--- xfce-mcs-manager/branches/xfce_4_2/po/en_GB.po 2005-09-26 08:35:08 UTC (rev 17839)
+++ xfce-mcs-manager/branches/xfce_4_2/po/en_GB.po 2005-09-26 09:35:25 UTC (rev 17840)
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
# British English translations for xfce-mcs-manager package.
-# Copyright (C) 2004 Zuza Software Foundation (Translate.org.za)
+# Copyright (C) 2002-2005 The Xfce development team.
--- xfce-mcs-manager/branches/xfce_4_2/po/lt.po 2005-09-26 08:35:08 UTC (rev 17839)
+++ xfce-mcs-manager/branches/xfce_4_2/po/lt.po 2005-09-26 09:35:25 UTC (rev 17840)
@@ -1,16 +1,15 @@
# Lithuanian translation of xfce-mcs-manager.
-# Copyright (C) 2003 LGPL Licence.
+# Copyright (C) 2002-2005 The Xfce development team.
On a side note,
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/x/xfce-mcs-manager/
xfce-mcs-manager_4.2.2-1/copyright
I was not sure how they could be treated in Debian policy.
Regards,
--
Daichi
Language Codes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/iso639.htm
Country Codes: http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/related/iso3166.txt
More information about the Xfce-i18n
mailing list