Thunarx API changes

[André Miranda]

We should definitively consider this option, but I can't comment because I
never used gobject-introspect nor thunarx-python.
Adam, do you have any experience with gobject-introspect? Is it able to
replace thunarx-python?

Cheers,
Andre Miranda

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Olivier Duchateau <
duchateau.olivier at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 23:07:54 -0300
> André Miranda <andre42m at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pablo,
> > As stated in thunar-dev at xfce.org, Adam volunteered to update
> thunarx-python.
> > If I correctly understood your suggestion, there was some talks in the
> > past about merging thunarx-python into thunar (I can't recall when or
> > where), but this hasn't advanced. I think it's a considerable amount of
> > effort for little benefit and risky since we are already breaking stuff
> > (port to gtk3 and API changes) =)
>
> Why not to add GObject Introspection in thunarx?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20171027/a3ac2d6a/attachment.html>