Fwd: Back to Xfce!

[Simon Steinbeiss]

Hi Andreas!

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:46 PM Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com>
wrote:

The patches are in my repo [1] - I have them at daily use for embedded
machines without RTC backup.

I understand gtk3+ has priority but what if I say that datetime setter
should be prepared for gtk3..

Andreas

[1] https
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>://
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>
github.com
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>/
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>
schnitzeltony
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>/
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>
xfce4-settings
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>/
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>tree
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>/
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>
datetime-patches
<https://github.com/schnitzeltony/xfce4-settings/tree/datetime-patches>


I haven't had time to look at the code - and to be honest this is the first
time I read about this. There are just so many open bugreports in bugzilla
that it's hard to keep an overview...


(My first impression is though that the map might be a bit over the top for
something so rarely used, as Nick inferred, but that doesn't mean it
shouldn't be integrated at all.)


I'm quite busy at the moment, but I'll give this a spin as soon as I can
(and maybe others will too - here's looking at you, Sean ;)) and then we
can discuss it in the bugreport.

Cheers

Simon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20151009/0e4488bf/attachment.html>