LightDM

[Robert Ancell]

>> > I haven't gotten far enough to see if it's going to be an issue,
>> > but if ldm requires pam, then I'd also love to see that as an
>> > optional requirement.
>>
>> It does currently use PAM, what alternative would you like it to
>> support?
>
>
> Supporting the "old" shadow auth would be great.  gdm-2.20.x is
> the last gdm branch to work without pam, so perhaps that would
> be worth a look.

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/623717