libxfce4menu with experimental merging support

[Jelle de Jong]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:55:21 +0100
> Jelle de Jong <jelledejong at powercraft.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> I've spent the last two days hacking on libxfce4menu because I had
>>> nothing better to do and I wanted to see how difficult it would be
>>> to implement menu merging. To sum things up: two commits, more than
>>> 1400 changes and ... merging works!
>>>
>>> Since my Subversion installation was broken earlier today I
>>> committed all of this to a git branch called 'merge-support'.
>>> Here's the ChangeLog:
>>>
>>>   http://git.xfce.org/jannis/libxfce4menu/log/?h=merge-support&showmsg=1
>>>
>>> This won't make it into 4.6 but it's a nice proof-of-concept for
>>> 4.8. I'll probably not implement it this way for 4.8 because I have
>>> a more solid two-pass parser concept in mind for 4.8 which will
>>> solve a lot of problems and workarounds with the implementation in
>>> that git branch.
>>>
>>> It works and you can test it. I've also made a (bit too large) demo
>>> video which you can download from here:
>>>
>>>   http://lunar-linux.org/~jannis/videos/xfce/libxfce4menu-merging-20090216.ogv
>>>
>>> In this video I'm using alacarte to customize my menu. Feel free to
>>> test it, but keep in mind that this will not be part of 4.6 and thus
>>> you should rather test trunk ;)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jannis
>> Looks good, will be a real pain killer for heavy menu user.
>>
>> Maybe you remember us talking about it at fosdem. But would it be
>> possible to have a look at the possibility to make a virtual file
>> system of the xdg .desktop menu and this nice customize menu feature
>> and make it possible to (fuse) mount and browse it with thunar as
>> normal file structure.
> 
> Of course that's possible. Instead of using FUSE though I'd recommend
> to write a GVfs handler for the applications:// URI. Once GVfs has
> landed in Thunar integration would be very smooth. 

Thanks, all true, but then it would not be desktop independent, it
would be nice it it works for every desktop environment thats why I
suggested using fuse. If its mounted in the normal file system like
possible with sshfs, cifs etcetera, thunar would not see the different
and the user can create gtk-bookmarks that show up in the shortcut
list of thunar.

> 
>> This way I don't have to use the panel menu, but it would be possible
>> to use thunar and the side shortcuts to act as menu. Making the file
>> manager the main part of the working environment.
>>
>> See the attached screenshots for a prototype mock up its not a virtual
>> file system.
> 
> It might be interesting for some people but it doesn't sound like
> something I'd implement in Xfce. It sounds more like a goodie or
> something.

Does not need to be implemented strait into xfce, but xfce/openbox
users are kind of the target group that would benefits for these extra
features.

> 
>   - Jannis

Are you interested in developing such mountable xdg desktop file
system? That also allows for customized menu with the menu editor used
in the desktop environment of the users choice.

Best regards,

Jelle
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAkmZV8sACgkQ1WclBW9j5Hn81QQAkwTXLFftoVlDb/OT1G89UMHV
uJsCg3GyhsQ0K2nFNlQiHvjYxOpv3FPoy5kXqfAswjWoMKA7b1HHKLdaOFwl19h8
gXmDfU6Om0KfD9dZOWyRk8n97k5JE9AKi2lpX7AYJRR7y+w5Zq8nlWgHBEqxxaoD
8JISrENKLxmMqdNQ9D8=
=Zldn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----