xfconf-errors.h enum error
Brian J. Tarricone
brian at tarricone.org
Tue Aug 4 00:24:51 CEST 2009
On 08/03/2009 09:04 AM, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
> David Mohr wrote:
>> That's not an error, at least not with gcc.
> But the unfortunate people like me that happens to like using C++ (g++)
> end up not being able to include this file, and this makes it difficult
> to make C++ wrappings (XFC) for xfconf.
Ah, looked into this a bit more. Apparently the trailing comma is
explicitly disallowed by C89, but allowed in C99 (to be symmetric with
the always-allowed trailing comma in array initializers). GCC has
supported the trailing comma as an extension in gnu89 mode (and others).
I don't know how that relates to the analogous C++ standards, or how
standards compliance works in g++ when compiling code inside an extern
"C" wrapper, but my guess is that -pedantic defaults to a C++ standard
too old to allow the trailing comma in enums.
So then it just boils down to a C99 vs. C89 debate. In the past I've
tried to avoid C99-specific stuff in my code, but lately I've started
relaxing this a bit, at least for the C99 features that seem to have
been supported for longer in a decent number of compilers (how I decide
this is of course entirely unscientific).
Anyway, this post was more an FYI sort of thing. I don't intend to
change these sorts of things in my code (and it's not just my code, and
not just xfconf).
-brian
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list