Projects in xfce repos, ehm...
Brian J. Tarricone
bjt23 at cornell.edu
Fri Nov 21 00:33:01 CET 2008
Christian Dywan wrote:
> I also think currently the definition of what 'Core' actually is, seems
> to be a little unclear, especially seeing how mixed the replies in this
> thread are I see that confirmed.
> Maybe there should actually be three categories, let me attempt to give
> a deliberate definition.
> Core: Components one needs in order to run a system in a useful way.
> That includes roughly panels, window manager, whatever xfdesktop is,
> the various settings applications, power management.
> ^^ All of those should be stable. For instance, if the powermanager
> isn't stable, I'd rather not see it there until it is.
> Apps: Applications that are useful, that really many Xfce users would
> use, but that are essentially replaceable. Such as terminal, file
> manager, editor, archiver, image viewer, media player.
> ^^ Thunar is a special one: it cannot practically be independant from
> Core, but semantically for me it should be.
> Goodies: All the rest kind of, things that are useful but not regularly
> maintained, somewhat specialized, unstable.
Not a bad distinction I suppose. How would you suggest the 'Apps'
category would be handled differently from 'Goodies'?
(Agree on Thunar -- xfdesktop becomes a bit less featureful if you don't
have thunar-vfs installed. Presumably 4.8 won't have such a hard
dependency as I plan to port xfdesktop to gio/gvfs.)
More information about the Xfce4-dev