MCS design proposal

[Bo Lorentsen]

Brian J. Tarricone wrote:

> We don't need anything fancy.  Xfsettings or XConf or whatever is fine. 
>   There's no need to come up with special terminology to replace 
> 'channels', because the term is more or less unimportant now.  If you 
> really want to, just use something like 'config nodes', since it really 
> is a true tree of preferences.
I like the simplicity of XConf, very few would misunderstand the purpose 
of that system, and it sounds like GConf, but it is what it does.

/BL