Squeeze is in need for an icon.
Stephan Arts
psybsd at gmail.com
Tue Jan 16 19:13:59 CET 2007
On 1/16/07, Stephan Arts <psybsd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Benedikt Meurer <benedikt.meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de> wrote:
> > Auke Kok wrote:
> > >>> It's first release (0.1.0) is scheduled to release with Xfce 4.4.0.
> > >> To whom it may concern (Sofar ??):
> > >>
> > >> I'm glad a better product will replace mine; however notify me in time if
> > >> the web hosting for Xarchiver is to be closed.
> > >
> > > there are no plans to do so! I will happily allow both projects to continue to coexist
> > > together!
> >
> > I don't know the exact details/differences, so excuse my probably stupid
> > question. But is there no way to merge these projects? I.e. use
> > libsqueeze for Xarchiver?
>
> Though libsqueeze is still in early stage of development. (a review
> and partial rewrite is scheduled for an upcoming release) The design
> of squeeze and Xarchiver is completely different.
>
> Not to forget, the different design philosophy's, Xarchiver is
> designed to be light-weight AND DE-independent. Squeeze on the other
> hand is designed to be light-weight and integrate into the Xfce
> Desktop Environment.
>
> Therefore Xarchiver only depends on Gtk+2, [1]
> while Squeeze depends on libxfce4util, thunar-vfs and libexo.
What i was trying to say... a merge is pretty difficult.
>
> >
> > > Auke
> >
> > Benedikt
Stephan
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list