License for 4.4
Thomas Leonard
talex5 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 5 17:55:49 CET 2007
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:27:54 +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Biju Chacko <botsie at xfce.org> [2007-01-05 08:19]:
>>
>> I think we should change the text of all GPL licensed components in XFCE
>> to GPL v2 only. This will allow us to move to GPL3 once we see a
>> consensus in the community to move to GPL3. Otherwise we will be
>> automatically switched when GPL3 is released.
>
> No, nothing is "automatically switched". Xfce stays GPLv2, the "or
> later" clause only means that somebody can re-license it under GPLv3
> which basically means that he is able to include the source code in a
> GPLv3 project.
>
>> I don't want to get into a license flamewar, but in my opinion we should
>> only move to GPL3 when several other big projects have done so. I don't
>> think any of us know enough about it, but I think it would be safer to
>> go along with the majority of the community is doing.
>
> Although I personally like the idea of GPLv2 only, I think that's not
> possbile. Xfce contains patches from many contributors, and you cannot
> change the license later without having acknowledges of every single
> contributor.
I think the problem is more going the other way: other projects (with the
"or later" clause) will no longer be able to copy code from Xfce.
--
Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list