sofar at foo-projects.org
Wed Apr 18 22:26:37 CEST 2007
Jani Monoses wrote:
>>> These are among factors that determine whether a project has a reason to be.
>>> If it is unmaintained and unused by others what is its purpose? This applies
>>> to any project I am not trying to bash XFC in particular.
>> Hard to disagree with :-) But I hope XFC will be more alive (I plan to
>> use it myself on some OSS projects), and I like to see it mature (and
>> are _trying_ to make this happened) more.
> If you're going to use it for OSS projects and you feel it's better suited than gtkmm, sure, no problem.
>> We can use the same argument between Xfce4 (I know Xfce4 was the first)
>> and GNOME as we can with XFC versus Gtkmm. Why wast energy on Xfce4 when
>> GNOME could need a hand or two :-) ?
> I just mentioned that (xfce core, thunar). The same argument cannot be used if
> the two projects compared have no clear and palpable differences :)
please don't strip the `John Doe wrote:...` lines.
The discussion is completely unreadable now.
More information about the Xfce4-dev