XFce 126.96.36.199 support for SunStudio under Solaris
rand_chars at rogers.com
Mon May 22 21:55:32 CEST 2006
On Sun, 21 May 2006 21:08:06 -0700, "Brian J. Tarricone" <bjt23 at cornell.edu>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Auke Kok wrote:
> > I doubt these should be merged as such:
> > * removing the panel locks will cause breakage. it's probably better to fix
> > the XFCE_PANEL_(LOCK|UNLOCK) routines to compile on __sun, and then it will
> > also compile properly when people add new _LOCK and _UNLOCK calls.
> Not really. The panel locks haven't been used in... over a year maybe?
> And they were only there for a little while during the development
> cycle, so there shouldn't even be any released version of Xfce that
> has/uses them. They should be safe to remove from the xfce4-mixer
> plugin entirely. Assuming xfce4-mixer is an external plugin now (which
> it should be), they're irrelevant anyway.
William seems to be porting Xfce 4.2, not 4.4. As far I know, the locks in the
panel were removed in 4.4, but they were still in use in 4.2.
That said, the effort should probably be spent in porting 4.4, since 4.2 is
over a year old, and 4.4 is on it's way.
More information about the Xfce4-dev