Small feature request
Rodrigo Coacci
rcoacci at gmail.com
Wed May 10 19:20:28 CEST 2006
I think that your verve-env class would suffice for that matters
On 5/10/06, Jannis Pohlmann <info at sten-net.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:46:10 -0300, Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
>
> > BTW, shouldn't we check for exec bit? At least in verve plugin I
> > didn't see it happening. Does it make any sense do the completion for
> > non-exec files in PATH?
> > Another thing: since xfrun, verve, and possibly thunar might use this
> > binaries list, shouldn't it be added to a xfce lib, so we don't
> > replicate code? exo, or libxfceutil perhaps? What do you guys think?
>
> This is a good idea, I think. Maybe we wrap this in a XfceCommands
> class or something similar in libxfce4util or exo.
>
> - Jannis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
>
>
>
--
Abraços,
Rodrigo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/attachments/20060510/90322737/attachment.html>
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list