Small feature request

Jannis Pohlmann info at
Wed May 10 18:56:06 CEST 2006

On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:46:10 -0300, Rodrigo Coacci wrote:

> BTW, shouldn't we check for exec bit? At least in verve plugin I
> didn't see it happening. Does it make any sense do the completion for
> non-exec files in PATH?
> Another thing: since xfrun, verve, and possibly thunar might use this
> binaries list, shouldn't it be added to a xfce lib, so we don't
> replicate code? exo, or libxfceutil perhaps? What do you guys think?

This is a good idea, I think. Maybe we wrap this in a XfceCommands
class or something similar in libxfce4util or exo.

- Jannis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list