ANNOUNCE: Xffm release

[Edscott Wilson Garcia]

El jue, 09-06-2005 a las 15:29 +0200, Benedikt Meurer escribió:
> Edscott Wilson Garcia wrote:
> >>Ok, your answer makes it rather clear to me. Just one question; if the
> >>libraries are libraries, shouldn't xffm open them with the full name,
> >>like libxffm_actions.so.2 instead of libxffm_actions.so?
> > 
> > Actually both "libxffm_actions.so" and "libxffm_actions.so.2" are just
> > symlinks to the real library "libxffm_actions.so.2.0.0". There probably
> > is a good reason for this, but I have no idea what it is.
> 
> You can add the -module switch to the _LDFLAGS for the given lib to tell 
> libtool to generate a "loadable module" rather than a "real shared 
> library". This way libtool will not generate the .so.<major> and 
> .so.<major>.<minor> files and it'll set the correct SONAME (for a module).
> 

I see. I will put the -module switch on when debug is not enable.

Thanks,


-- 
Edscott Wilson Garcia <edscott at xfce.org>