E17 benchmarks

[Jasper Huijsmans]

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:10:09PM +0200, Olivier FOURDAN wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Xfwm4 computes the best suitable placement for a window before showing it. It basically means that it scans the whole screen, 8pix by 8pix computing the global overlap between every visible window at each iteration.
> 
> That benchmark shows nothing at all. If you remove the smart palcement, xfwm4 would probably be a lot faster *for that benchmark*  but would be a lot less usable IMO.
> 
> The speed of a window manager doesn't come from its ability to map windows as quickly as possible, but to respond to user (ie resize/move windows).
> 

That's what I thought, thanks ;-) Just wanted to make sure.

	Jasper