How to maintain non-core stuff?

[Jasper Huijsmans]

Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> 
>> Benedikt Meurer wrote:
>>
>>> Auke Kok wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I'd prefer all separate packages to be toplevel modules.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> same... it would make no sense to impose a virtual hierarchy in the 
>>>> SVN tree, except maybe 'xfce4' for the xfce4 core components. apart 
>>>> from that everything should go right under the top.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can we agree on the repository layout suggested by the SVN book 
>>> (trunk, branches, tags) then? With everything as toplevel modules? 
>>> (somehow I doubt that it will be useful to have a separate xfce4 
>>> subdir in the long run, besides that it makes tagging/branching of 
>>> full releases somewhat tricky)
>>
>>
>> Ok, so I think we're all pretty much agreed that we want to move to 
>> svn.  Now, let's actually do it.  Though it's probably best to wait 
>> until after FOSDEM.  I'm fine with using the trunk/branches/tags 
>> layout.  As for the overall repo layout, I think the consensus is to 
>> just do everything at the toplevel, except for the xfce core 
>> components.  So we have:
>>
>> |-xfce4/
>> | +-xfwm4/
>> | +-xfce4-panel/
>> | `- ... (other core components) ...
>> +-xfmedia/
>> +-mousepad/
>> +-(other xfce-related apps)
>> +-xfce4-systemload-plugin/
>> +-xfce4-weather-plugin/
>> `-(other panel plugins)
>>
>> Does that sound like what we want to do?  Do we want to create a 
>> subdirectory for the plugins as well as the core?
> 
> 
> As said, I don't think the separate xfce4 directory buy us anything. 
> Better to have everything as toplevel modules. E.g., lets say I'm a 
> translator, then I can just use gvim */po/de.po to update all 
> translations...
> 

Fine with me as well. Even though gvim */po/de.po */*/po/de.po isn't 
that much harder ;-)