cvs question

Auke Kok sofar at
Fri Feb 18 14:16:21 CET 2005

Benedikt Meurer wrote:

> Juha Kautto wrote:
>> Hi,
> Hey Juha,
>> We are planning a major upgrade to xfcalendar. The idea is to drop 
>> dbh and use ical instead. It means that CVS version of xfcalendar 
>> will be rather unstable for a while and new features will come and go 
>> fast.  But since we also fixed all 4.2 bugs and added some minor 
>> features into the current 4.2, I would like to freeze the current cvs 
>> version for 4.2.1 release, which I suppose should happen fairly soon ?
>> So is it possible to maintain two branches now in cvs ? How ?
>> Like stable(=4.2.x bug fixes and minor featurtes)
>> and HEAD(= new things).
> Thats already the case. We have basicly two branches, HEAD and 
> xfce_4_2. HEAD is the development branch, where you can break things, 
> and which will result in 4.4.0. xfce_4_2 is the stable branch which 
> gets only bugfixes, and from which maintaince releases for 4.2 will be 
> made.

viewcvs doesn't show any xfce_4_2_? branches except xfce_4_2_0rc3... 
perhaps someone cares to rename the tag or something to make this clear? 
Or is this a viewcvs limitation?


More information about the Xfce4-dev mailing list