KDE Versus Xfce
Brian J. Tarricone
bjt23 at cornell.edu
Wed Dec 21 01:11:44 CET 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 12/20/2005 3:45 PM, Erik Harrison wrote:
> Lubos Ludak has been doing some performance profiling for KDE. He's
> been using Xfce startup as his benchmark. Given dropping some things
> from KDE to "match" Xfce featurewise, he's matched us for startup.
> He also nicely provides the bootchart, showing a profile of Xfce's
> disk and CPU utilization. He even capitalizes Xfce right.
Ugh, xfdesktop takes forever to start, and I imagine it's worse in SVN
(well, actually, maybe a draw, since I improved the initial menu
generation time). Methinks I need to sit down with sysprof for a while.
Would be nice if xfce4-session could start stuff in parallel, though I
figure that's probably non-trivial to implement, else Benny would have
done it. That chart seems to show some sleeping slices (disk I/O?) near
the start of all apps such that parallel startup might yield faster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Xfce4-dev