A little shadow patch ...
fourdan at xfce.org
Fri Nov 12 08:38:43 CET 2004
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:59 +0100, Nikolas Arend wrote:
> >Oh, yeah you are wrong.
> So xfce is not meant for a broader audience? Pity, 'cause I think you
> have a good chance to show everybody that an intelligent desktop implementation can
> be both rich of features that really matter and lightweight and stable as well.
> Unlike some well known OS for the i386 architecture.
Please read my statement again, I did not say I was against a broader
audience, I said it's definitely not the initial goal, and it's still
not the goal ("being a choice for a broader audience" would be a
meaningless goal IMO)
More information about the Xfce4-dev