Semi-OT: Getting back into programming

[Peeter Vois]

Hi,

I am mostly using Source Navigator, I have to say that I like it because 
it does not force me to think in GNOME or something else specific, I can 
easily start writing code for 8 bit micro or just take myself familiar 
with someone else's code. It can make a flat makefile aswell with simple 
dialogs, but I prefer to write Makefiles  by myself, and then I just let 
this tool to use external Makefile for build command.

http://sourcenav.sourceforge.net/

Best Regards ...
Peeter Vois

Joe Klemmer wrote:

>	Ok, as much as I hate C, I have made the decision to try and get back
>into doing programming again.  It's been 10 years since I was a "real"
>programmer, and that was COBOL on MVS (the first person to laugh get a
>smack up side the head!)  I have gotten some very good books on C
>programming and found a few web sites with tutorials and such, including
>the GTK one.  My question now is what tool/IDE/environment to use.  I
>currently have Code Crusader, CodeForge, Anjuta and, of course, the
>vim/nedit with-lots-of-xterms IDE.  I also have Borland C++ Builder X
>and KDevelop but they seem more for C++ than C, though I'm sure I could
>do C with them.  The problem with the IDE's, other than the vim/nedit
>option, is the steep learning curve they all have.  It's almost as much
>to learn the IDE as it is the language.
>
>	I would like to ask what others are using.  What is the preferred
>method or tools of development being used by you guys?  I sm leaning
>towards either Anjuta or the vim/nedit method but am not against using
>something else.  It would be good to be as compatible as possible with
>you guys.  I'm not against taking a few months to learn an IDE but I'd
>rather learn one than all of them.
>
>	Thanks and please make sure that if you reply to the list you also cc
>me.  I'm so far behind on reading my lists that it'll probably take
>months to just catch up.
>
>TIA,
>Joe
>
>  
>