xfce4-terminal 0.0.2 is out
Don Christensen
djc at cisco.com
Tue Jul 27 05:33:19 CEST 2004
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Eduard Roccatello wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:06:18 -0400
>>"Derek T. Yarnell" <derek at cs.umd.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What is wrong with xterm again?
>>>
>>
>>It lacks tabs, session support (in a future :-), xft support and so on.
>>I like xterm but i prefer something advanced
>
>
> plus, xterm is ugly ^_~. if you're using a GUI, why use something that
> isn't visually pleasing? IMO, that's the _point_ of a GUI. just my
> aesthetic opinion, of course.
>
> -brian
I feel just the opposite. A terminal is for interacting with a command
line. It doesn't need to be "pretty", it needs to be functional without
getting in the way. I don't want menu bars and tool bars and what not.
I'm not even sure I would want tabs, although having them as an option
might be nice. I want as little decoration as possible so that I can
get as much text on the screen as possible.
My main desires would for session support and light weight (defined as
minimal memory footprint and quick response), and I think the Xft thing
is worth looking into for nicer fonts. I wouldn't mind better color
support for stuff like "ls", but that would be well down on my personal
wish list.
Just my two cents.
-Don
--
Don Christensen Senior Software Development Engineer
djc at cisco.com Cisco Systems, Santa Cruz, CA
"It was a new day yesterday, but it's an old day now."
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list