compile problems with xfrun
jasper at xfce.org
Thu Jul 22 18:12:20 CEST 2004
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>>>Anyway, I just wanted to raise the issue here to see if anyone has objections
>>>or otherwise strong opinion about it.
> so by that you mean you'll email the list and go ahead and do it anyway
> before anyone has a chance to respond?
That statement was mine ;-) It seemed like something that should be
discussed to me.
> furthermore, i don't see why xfheaders is necessary. why can't
> xfce4-modules simply install its own header files? i may be
> misunderstanding exactly what you're trying to do here, but i'm sure
> there's a less confusing way of doing this that avoids adding another
The issue I raised is that xfrun depends optionally on xfce4-modules.
For that purpose it used to have a private copy of a xfce4-modules
header files. Edscott changed that, effectively making xfce-utils depend
on xfce4-modules during build.
xfheaders is not a general headers package, but only for xfce4-modules.
Therefore it should be called xfce4-modules-headers, if anything. I
still don't like the idea of extra modules for this though.
More information about the Xfce4-dev