4.2.0? dare i say it?
jasper at xfce.org
Thu Dec 30 09:54:25 CET 2004
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> hi all,
> so 4.2rc3 has been out for about a week, and it doesn't appear to have
> any major problems (that have been reported, anyway). the only
> potential red flags i see are bugs 607 and 619, which may or may not be
> blockers. 619 by itself shouldn't be a blocker, but fixing it may
> require some risky changes to xfwm4 (i dunno, so safer to be
> conservative). 607 seems to be an isolated case; i haven't heard of it
> so, barring further complications, what do we think of releasing
> 4.2.0-final after new year's, say on the weekend of the 8th? that gives
> another week and a half for other problems to appear or to fix some
> trivial bugs.
Yeah, this is what I had in mind as well. Or maybe have the tarballs
ready for packagers on the 8th and have another week to create and test
binaries. This is a .0 release after all and we should make sure
everything works completely as expected. Benny?
We should make a list of what we need for the release. From the top of
* Check documentation: version numbers and bugzilla references (don't
claim xfce4-dev is the preferred method of reporting bugs). I'll do that.
* Website update. Francois has most of this ready I think (?).
* List of mirrors, so we can notify them before release. I think we have
* Release notes. Ahem, we are not very good at this, generally. For a
new stable branch we could do with a bit of PR. Some translated versions
might be nice as well. No idea how to go about doing this properly.
More information about the Xfce4-dev