Trash Handling Spec

[edscott wilson garcia]

El jue, 26-08-2004 a las 17:47, Erik Harrison escribió:
> It may be worth telling them how xffm currently handled trash. At
> least early in the discussion there was talk of maintaining the entire
> directory tree under .trash for trashed files, in order to prevent
> filename collisions. This seemed like a major performance issue,
> especially for systems with filesystems that perform badly for
> directory creation. The spec may benefit from a quick description of
> what you already do.
> 

I'm afraid they will not understand me and I will only annoy them. That
seems to be happening quite often as of late.

regards,

Edscott

 
> -Erik
> 
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:16:46 -0500, edscott <edscott at prodigy.net.mx> wrote:
> > El mié, 25-08-2004 a las 21:28, Biju Chacko escribió:
> > > Edscott,
> > >
> > > There is a discussion on trash handling going on on freedesktop xdg list
> > > starting with this post:
> > >
> > > http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/xdg/2004-August/004527.html
> > >
> > 
> > Thanks, I'll keep an eye open.
> > 
> > > You may want get involved, so that syncing with a new spec doesn't
> > > become a pain.
> > 
> > If they agree to something it will make trash collection in xffm easier,
> > since the standard could be made to look like just another wastebasket.
> > 
> > regards
> > 
> > Edscott
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xfce4-dev mailing list
> > Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> > http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
> > 
>