Trash Handling Spec

[Erik Harrison]

It may be worth telling them how xffm currently handled trash. At
least early in the discussion there was talk of maintaining the entire
directory tree under .trash for trashed files, in order to prevent
filename collisions. This seemed like a major performance issue,
especially for systems with filesystems that perform badly for
directory creation. The spec may benefit from a quick description of
what you already do.

-Erik

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:16:46 -0500, edscott <edscott at prodigy.net.mx> wrote:
> El mié, 25-08-2004 a las 21:28, Biju Chacko escribió:
> > Edscott,
> >
> > There is a discussion on trash handling going on on freedesktop xdg list
> > starting with this post:
> >
> > http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/xdg/2004-August/004527.html
> >
> 
> Thanks, I'll keep an eye open.
> 
> > You may want get involved, so that syncing with a new spec doesn't
> > become a pain.
> 
> If they agree to something it will make trash collection in xffm easier,
> since the standard could be made to look like just another wastebasket.
> 
> regards
> 
> Edscott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
> 


-- 
-Erik