Changes allowed before release (Was: Re: Bunch of (small) bug fixes in xfwm4)

[Olivier Fourdan]

Jsaper,

No, we keep latest format change, if it's buggy, then Edscott will deal
with users :)

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 11:59, Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> Op za 13-09-2003, om 10:10 schreef Olivier Fourdan:
> > Hi Edscott,
> > 
> > On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 04:03, edscott wilson garcia wrote:
> > 
> > > So we are looking at rc5 ;-)
> > 
> > No, I'm getting sick of this RC cycle.
> > 
> 
> Hear, hear ;-)
> 
> > > I've also just updating xffm: the format of the program register has
> > > changed to xml, which allowed to remove some small bugs and to enhance
> > > the run combo autocompletion with a system wide file.
> > 
> > My changes are small, with few impact on the code. Changing a file
> > format to XML after RC4 is definitely another matter... 
> > 
> > We'll ship as is, if xffm is buggy, so be it.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, this is getting complicated in CVS. 
> 
> We need to change version numbers and I want to be able to update
> translations and documentation before 4.0, but you don't want to use
> this file format change.
> 
> So, perhaps we should create an xfce_4_0 branch in CVS at the rc4 tag
> and do only the updates that don't really impact the code. After 4.0,
> this branch can be used for bugfix releases 4.0.x.
> 
> New developments, 4.1.x releases, can then continue on the HEAD branch.
> 
> What's your opinion?
> 
> 	Jasper
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
-- 
Olivier Fourdan - fourdan at xfce.org
   
   Interoperability is the keyword, uniformity is a dead end. 
   http://www.xfce.org