gettext version [Was: Re: japanese translation fail]
fourdan at xfce.org
Mon Jun 23 22:29:05 CEST 2003
Mandrake ships xfce engines, I guess that's why you get a conflict.
I guess you could just use "--replacefiles"
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 22:00, Ric wrote:
> Hi Benedikt:
> Thanks - was not sure if the effort was needed.
> I RE-built SRPMS from Beta1 with some spec mod's and
> compiled RPMS that all worked/installed ( except the new
> gtk-xfce-engine because it conflicted with 'gtk-engines2'
> and "xfce" that have the older gtk-xfce-engine files ).
> Doing that was mostly an experiment to see if it could be
> done with XFce4 and how best to do it. Doing it here is
> okay but making it so that another MDK can use them is,
> well, you know, harder.
> Everything was running AOK and then, a few days ago, user
> and root, both, got hammered -different errors in the
> display- panel won't start, <blah> ... Anyway, once Beta
> 2 can be had, I will work on it again and will test them on
> a vanilla MDK9 install I have on another system( Beta2 was
> just too close to release to make the fix&test effort for
> Beta1 ). If the tests on it are ok, I'll let you folks
> know about it.
> --- Benedikt Meurer <Benedikt.Meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de>
> > On Mon, 23, Jun 2003, Ric wrote:
> > > On that note I have another question:
> > > Is there a need for someone to test XFce4 on
> > > MandrakeSoft 9.x distro; provide S/RPMS, bug reports,
> > I'm using XFce4 on MDK9 at work, although I never really
> > managed to
> > get working RPMs (might be due to the fact that I really
> > hate RPM,
> > and RPM hates me :-). It would be nice if someone could
> > provide
> > MDK9 RPMs, atleast it would make life a bit easier for me
> > :-)
> > Benedikt
> > --
> BTW, RPM is a picky ! but she's easy if you talk nice to
> her & about her.
> Have A Great Day!
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
More information about the Xfce4-dev