gettext version [Was: Re: japanese translation fail]
fhj52ads at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 23 19:57:55 CEST 2003
Thanks for the info -did not know 0.11.4-7 was broken;
thought it was previous version that was causing trouble.
On that note I have another question:
Is there a need for someone to test XFce4 on MandrakeSoft
9.x distro; provide S/RPMS, bug reports, etc?
( ... There is a big problem with GTK+ package naming
scheme for RH-vs-MDK. Also, there is freetype 1 -vs-
freetype 2 and some other things... It's a lot of effort
to get XFce4 up and stable. )
--- Benedikt Meurer <Benedikt.Meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de>
> On Mon, 23, Jun 2003, Ric wrote:
> Hello Ric,
> > Is there a chance that y'all could stick with 0.11.4? -
> > least until it proves to be unacceptable.
> > The 0.11.4 is the version supplied with RH9(
> > gettext-0.11.4-7.i386.rpm ).
> We are about to standardize on 0.11.5, because the
> version shipped
> with RH9 does not work. It would be rather senseless to
> on the broken RH9 version :-)
> > It seems a shame to mandate
> > an upgrade for people that just upgraded (which may
> > people from using XFce4).
> This is only for developers. Users are free to use
> whatever version they
> want to use. Although I suggest anyone to use the
> versions mentioned
> here. This may prevent you from unneccessary trouble.
> > Ric
> > ***
Have A Great Day!
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
More information about the Xfce4-dev