Fwd: Re: Xinerama

[Olivier Fourdan]

Chris,

If windows appear off screen in Xinerama, it most likely means that
Xinerama was not specified when compiling libxfcegui4.

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 17:09, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> We had this conversation offlist.  Perhaps my Xinerama problem will be fixed
> with an upgrade.
> 
> /dev/idal
> 
> --- Chris de Vidal <cdevidal at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 08:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Chris de Vidal <cdevidal at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: Xinerama
> > To: Francois Le Clainche <fleclainche at wanadoo.fr>
> > 
> > --- Francois Le Clainche <fleclainche at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > > > Could you set your smaller monitor to Y coordinate 600 or something and
> > see
> > > if
> > > > new windows dissapear into the dead space?  Often new windows will appear
> > > in 0
> > > > 0 which is offscreen for me.
> > > 
> > > Hi, thx for your answer.
> > > 
> > > I've tested, with several configurations, and *new* windows do not 
> > > appear into the dead space.
> > 
> > Hm, OK.  That's worth upgrading for (:
> > 
> > > *But* any application which is *told* to start at 0x0y (ie. gkrellm or
> > > the taskbar) ends totally or partially hidden. I do not think this is an
> > > abnormal behaviour, even if it's annoying. Did you test with a wm like 
> > > fluxbox, which, afaik, handles xinerama quite well ?
> > 
> > XFCE3 handled this beautifully, while KDE had this same problem.
> > 
> > =====
> > /dev/idal
> > "GNU/Linux is free freedom" --Me
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
> http://calendar.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
-- 
Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
http://www.xfce.org