What to do with CVS

[Olivier Fourdan]

Hi Jasper,

CVS migration is still not a high priority task IMHO. It basically
works, it could work better, but for now I think we have better things
to do.

As for tagging and branching, I'm waiting for everybody's green light to
tag the beta1.

Once we have xfce4 final released, we'll branch for next version
developpment. I think it's too early to branch now.

Still to do, though, add -lXext to xfwm4 linking or Solaris: I'm wating
for Benny to update the m4 scripts.

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 22:01, Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> It just occurred to me that we also still have to decide what to do with
> our CVS. I guess it doesn't necessarily have to be before the beta, but
> it certainly hope it can be before the 4.0 release.
> 
> Some issues:
> 
> * Do we stay on SourceForge? I hope we can take up Chuck on his offer to
> host our CVS.
> 
> * Olivier and I briefly discussed if we could perhaps use subversion
> instead of CVS (see http://subvsersion.tigris.org and
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/html-chunk/). I would like to try and use
> it, but that depends very much on whether it is at all possible on
> the server and if it won't cause too much problems for Chuck. What is
> the status of this idea?
> 
> * Move sources from xfce-devel. I supose a new xfce4/ directory is as
> good a choice as any. 
> 
> * Perhaps we should start using CVS branches better, like benny
> suggested. So we make a <module>_4_0 branch for fixes on the stable
> release, while we continue 4.1.x development on HEAD.
> 
> 
> 	Jasper
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
-- 
Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
http://www.xfce.org