Xfce4 rc2 is out
Ilkka Ollakka
ilkka.j.ollakka at students.oamk.fi
Mon Jul 21 15:39:16 CEST 2003
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:06:57AM -0700, Ric wrote:
> --- Koblinger Egmont <egmont at uhulinux.hu> wrote:
> > version of libtool. You might not see this step in an rpm spec file,
> > e.g.
> > at mandrake this step is included by default in %configure. When our
> > libtool was still at 1.4.3 but we tried to compile apps that had libtool
> > 1.5 inside their tarball, the phenomenon was exactly the one described by
> > Scott: everything was okay except for the ".so" missing from the filename.
> Mandrake _still_ uses 1.4. They even have a "libtoolize" when
> necessary in
> their spec files:
> %build
> ...
> # we don't use libtool 1.5 yet
> %define __libtoolize /bin/true
> ...
> which if added to the dbh.spec file(in %build) causes the srpm and rpm to have
> the correct names for the lib. ( i.e., it does /usr/bin/install -c
> .libs/libdbh-1.0.so.1.0.0 /var/tmp/dbh-root/usr/lib/libdbh-1.0.so.1.0.0 the
> way it should)
>
Thanks, I'll have a look on it when I get home
--
Ilkka Ollakka
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list