why should I use xfce4-iconbox?
Voicu Liviu
pacman at huji.ac.il
Wed Apr 2 10:40:03 CEST 2003
I'm sorry, I meant to say xftaskbar4 instead of xfce4-panel.
Can you review my question considering xftaskbar4 instead of xfce4-panel?
Thanks
On 02 Apr 2003 21:16:49 +0200
Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org> wrote:
> Liviu,
>
> Nope, iconbox is for running apps, xfce4-panel is for launching apps
> (it's a bit straight, but basically, it's what's for)
>
> A better question would have been "why should I run xfce-iconbox while
> there is already a taskbar?" and the answer would have been "because you
> may prefer the icon box" ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Olivier.
>
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 08:09, Voicu Liviu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Any 1 could explain why should I use xfce4-iconbox if I use xfce4-panel?
> > I mean, xfce4-panel does xfce4-iconbox`s job so why xfce4-iconbox exists?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Liviu
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xfce4-dev mailing list
> > Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
> --
> Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org>
> http://www.xfce.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev
>
More information about the Xfce4-dev
mailing list