xfce4-notifyd and support for <br> tag. Do we need it?
corsac at debian.org
Tue Feb 23 14:47:10 CET 2010
On 23/02/2010 14:30, uh.linux at gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that <br> tag is not in notification specs
> ( http://galago-project.org/specs/notification/0.9/x161.html ), and with
> that reason my patch was rejected (
> http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6247 ).
For good reasons, then.
> I'm maintaining
> xfce4-notifyd for MOPSLinux - russian slackware clone, and I will
> include my patch in any case. I respect Brian J. Tarricone's decision,
> but may be community will find my patch is useful and good for
> xfce4-notifyd development?
I don't think the patch is useful if it breaks xfce4-notifyd spec
support. Instead of breaking it, you should better submit a patch to the
spec, so it gets updated (if it's useful, I have to admit I don't know
about that), and only then submit the patch to implementations.
More information about the Xfce